Content Types

Artist Profiles (2)

Audio (4)

Audio Papers (4)

Editorial (1)

Essays (5)

Interviews (6)

Scores (5)

Series (1)

Text Poems (5)

Contributors (57)

  • Allanah Stewart
  • Allanah Stewart is an artist from Aotearoa/New Zealand, currently living in Melbourne, Australia. As well as her work in various experimental music projects, she is the presenter of a monthly podcast radio programme called Enquiring Minds, hosted by Noods radio, which explores old and new, lesser known and well known sounds that loosely fit under the banner of experimental music.

  • Jen Callaway
  • Jen Callaway is a Melbourne musician, sound and performance artist, photographer, and community services worker raised in various parts of Tasmania. Current projects include bands Is There a Hotline?, Propolis, Snacks and Hi God People; and upcoming film Here at the End, by Campbell Walker, as actor/co-writer.

  • Isha Ram Das
  • Isha Ram Das is a composer and sound artist primarily concerned with ecologies of environment and culture. He works with experimental sound techniques to produce performances, installations and recordings. He was the 2019 recipient of the Lionel Gell Award for Composition, and has scored feature-length films and nationally-touring theatre installations. He has performed at institutions such as the Sydney Opera House; Black Dot Gallery, Melbourne; Institute of Modern Art, Brisbane; Metro Arts, Brisbane; Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney; and Boxcopy, Brisbane.

  • Dylan Robinson
  • Dylan Robinson is a xwélméxw (Stó:lō) writer, artist, scholar and curator, He is Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Arts, and associate professor at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. He is author of Hungry Listening, Resonant Theory for Indigenous Sound Studies, published by University of Minnesota Press.

  • Megan Cope
  • Megan Cope is a Quandamooka woman (North Stradbroke Island) in South East Queensland. Her site-specific sculptural installations, video work and paintings investigate issues relating to identity, the environment and mapping practices. Cope’s work often resists prescribed notions of Aboriginality and becomes psychogeographies across various material outcomes that challenge the grand narrative of ‘Australia’ as well as our sense of time and ownership in a settler colonial state.

  • Sean Baxter
  • Australian musician Sean Baxter died on 15 March 2020. Part of Melbourne's improv scene, he is described by musician Anthony Pateras as possessing “a unique aesthetic vision and intellectual depth, mixing highbrow philosophical concepts with punk sensibilities in how he lived, spoke and played. He was pure energy.”

    Drumkit and percussionist, Sean was an Australian improviser who forged an international reputation as a bold explorer of percussive possibilities both as a soloist and through his work with the acclaimed avant-garde trio, Pateras/Baxter/Brown. Focusing on the use of extended techniques applied to the conventional drum kit, he utilised an arsenal of metallic junk and other percussive detritus to expand the sonic palette of the percussion tradition. In addition to Pateras/Baxter/Brown, he was involved in many collaborations and was drummer for groups The Throwaways, Bucketrider, Lazy, SxSxSx and Terminal Hz.

  • Thomas Ragnar
  • Thomas Ragnar is an artist based in Singapore. His work is often underpinned by collaborations, affinities and research with experiential methodologies.

  • Alessandro Bosetti
  • Alessandro Bosetti is an Italian composer, performer and sound artist, currently based in Marseille. His work delves into the musicality of spoken language, utilising misunderstandings, translations and interviews as compositional tools. His works for voice and electronics blur the line between electro-acoustic composition, aural writing and performance.

  • Lin Chi-Wei
  • Lin Chi-Wei is a legend of Taiwanese sonic art, whose practice incorporates folklore culture, noise, ritual, and audience participation.

  • Mat Dryhurst
  • Mat Dryhurst is an artist who releases music and artworks solo and in conjunction with Holly Herndon and the record label PAN. Dryhurst developed the decentralised publishing framework Saga, which enables creators to claim ownership of each space in which their work appears online, and a number of audio plays that derive their narrative from the personal information of listeners. He lectures on issues of music, technology, and ideology at NYU, and advises the blockchain-based platform co-operative Resonate.is.

  • Sean Dockray
  • Sean Dockray is an artist, writer, and programmer living in Melbourne whose work explores the politics of technology, with a particular emphasis on artificial intelligences and the algorithmic web. He is also the founding director of the Los Angeles non-profit Telic Arts Exchange, and initiator of knowledge-sharing platforms, The Public School and Aaaaarg.

  • Emile Frankel
  • Author of Hearing the Cloud (Zero Books), Emile Frankel is a writer and composer researching the changing conditions of online listening. In his spare time he runs the Sci-Fi and critical fantasy publisher Formling.

  • Bridget Chappell
  • Bridget Chappell is a raver and theory bro currently living on the unceded nations of the Latji Latji and Nyeri Nyeri people. They make music as Hextape and organise parties in drains, observatories, and other natural amphitheatres. They founded and run Sound School, work with young musicians behind bars, and make experimental sound technologies to challenge police sirens.

  • Holly Herndon
  • Holly Herndon experiments at the outer reaches of dance music and pop. Born in Tennessee, Herndon spent her formative years in Berlin’s techno scene and repatriated to San Francisco, where she completed her PhD at Stanford’s Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics. Her albums include Platform (2015) and Proto (2019).

  • Candice Hopkins
  • Candice Hopkins is a curator, writer and researcher interested in history, art and indigeneity, and their intersections. Originally from Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Hopkins is a citizen of Carcross/Tagish First Nation. She was senior curator for the 2019 Toronto Biennial of Art, and worked on the curatorial teams for the Canadian Pavilion at the 58th Venice Biennale, and documenta 14.

  • Raven Chacon
  • Raven Chacon is a composer, performer and artist from Fort Defiance, Navajo Nation. His work ranges from chamber music to experimental noise, to large scale installations, produced solo and with the Indigenous art collective Postcommodity. At California Institute of the Arts, Chacon studied with James Tenney, Morton Subotnick, Michael Pisaro and Wadada Leo Smith developing a compositional language steeped in both the modernist avant-garde and Indigenous cosmologies and subjectivities. He has written for ensembles, musicians and non-musicians, and for social and educational situations, and toured the world as a noise artist.

  • Lisa Lerkenfeldt
  • Lisa Lerkenfeldt is a multi-disciplinary artist working in sound, gesture and performance. Central to her practice is languages of improvisation and intimacy with technology. Traces of a personal discipline and form of graphic notation are introduced in the online exhibition 14 Gestures. The associated recorded work Collagen (Shelter Press, 2020) disrupts the role of the common hair comb through gesture and sound.

  • Haroon Mirza
  • Haroon Mirza is an artist who intertwines his practice with the role of composer. Mirza considers electricity his main medium and creates atmospheric environments through the linking together of light, sound, music, videos and elements of architecture. Regularly showing internationally in group and solo exhibitions, Mirza’s work has also been included in the 7th Shenzhen Sculpture Biennale, China (2012) and the 54th Venice Biennale, Italy (2011), where he was awarded the Silver Lion.

  • 33EMYBW
  • Shanghai native 33EMYBW (Wu Shanmin) has been an active member in the Chinese music scene for over a decade. She has also performed at CTM and Sinotronics in Germany, China Drifting Festival in Switzerland, and SXSW. Her 2018 album Golem, released on SVBKVLT, was met with critical acclaim and voted one of the best electronic albums of 2018 by Bandcamp. In 2019 she released DONG2 EP under Merrie Records Beijing, and will premiere her sophomore album Arthropods (SVBKVLT) at Unsound 2019.

  • Alexander Garsden
  • Alexander Garsden is a Melbourne-based composer, guitarist and electroacoustic musician, working across multiple exploratory musical disciplines. Recent work includes commissions from the Sydney Symphony Orchestra, the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra, Speak Percussion, Michael Kieran Harvey and Eugene Ughetti; alongside performances with artists including Tetuzi Akiyama (Japan), Oren Ambarchi, Radu Malfatti (Austria), Julia Reidy, David Stackenäs (Sweden), and with Erkki Veltheim and Rohan Drape. From 2014 to 2019 Garsden was Co-Director of the INLAND Concert Series. He has taught through RMIT University and the University of Melbourne.

  • Annika Kristensen
  • Annika Kristensen is Senior Curator at the Australian Centre for Contemporary Art, Melbourne.

  • Arben Dzika
  • Arben Dzika is an artist whose practice involves working with various media including, but not limited to: sound, image, word, and performance. His work primarily seeks to reflect on, interrogate, and play with technologies, systems, and human senses. Within his practice, he works as a producer and DJ under the moniker, Dilae.

  • Audrey Schmidt
  • Audrey Schmidt is a writer and editor based in Melbourne, Australia. She is a regular contributor to Memo Review, co-editor the third issue of Dissect Journal, and has written for various publications including Art Monthly, Art + Australia and un Magazine. She co-founded Minority Report with Adam Hammad in 2018 and released one online issue that was available until the domain expired in 2019. Audrey sits on the FYTA (GR) Board of Advisors.

  • Autumn Royal
  • Autumn Royal is a poet, researcher, and teacher based in Narrm/Melbourne. Autumn’s current research examines elegiac expression in contemporary poetry. Autumn is the interviews editor for Cordite Poetry Review, and author of the poetry collections She Woke & Rose (Cordite Books, 2016) and Liquidation (Incendium Radical Library, 2019). Her third collection of poetry is forthcoming with Giramondo Publishing in 2021.

  • Bianca Winataputri
  • Bianca Winataputri is a Melbourne-based independent curator and writer researching contemporary practice in Southeast Asia, and relationships between individuals and collectives in relation to history, globalisation, identity and community building. Currently working at Regional Arts Victoria, Bianca was previously Assistant Curator of Contemporary Art at the NGA. She holds a BA (University of Melbourne), and BA Honours from the ANU where she received the Janet Wilkie Prize for Art. In 2018 Bianca was selected for 4A Centre for Contemporary Asian Art’s Curators’ Intensive.

  • Brian Hioe
  • Brian Hioe was one of the founding editors of New Bloom, an online magazine covering activism and youth politics in Taiwan and the Asia Pacific, founded in 2014 in the wake of the Sunflower Movement. Hioe is a freelance writer on social movements and politics, as well as an occasional translator.

  • Chi Tran
  • Chi Tran is a writer, editor, and an artist who makes poems that may be text, video, object, sound, or drawing. Chi is primarily interested in working with language as a means of coming-to-terms. Their work has been published by Incendium Radical Library Press, Cordite Poetry Review, Australian Poetry and Liminal Magazine and exhibited at galleries including Firstdraft, Sydney; Punk Café, Melbourne; and ACCA, Melbourne. In 2019, as a recipient of The Ian Potter Cultural Trust Fund, Chi spent three months in New York developing their practice with renowned poets including Mei-mei Berssenbrugge, Fred Moten, and Jackie Wang.

  • Chun Yin Rainbow Chan
  • Chun Yin Rainbow Chan is a Hong Kong–Australian artist, living in Sydney. Working across music, performance and installation, Rainbow is interested in the copy and how the ways in which it can disrupt Western notions of ownership. Central to Rainbow's work is the circulation of knock-off objects, sounds and images in global media. Her work positions the counterfeit as a complex sign that shapes new myths, values and contemporary commodity production.

  • Dale Gorfinkel
  • Dale Gorfinkel is a musician-artist whose stylefree improvisational approach informs his performances, instrument-building, and kinetic sound installations. Aiming to reflect an awareness of the dynamic nature of culture and the value of listening as a mode of knowing people and places, Dale is interested in bringing creative communities together and shifting perceived boundaries. Current projects include Prophets, Sounds Like Movement, and Music Yared as well as facilitating Art Day South, an inclusive arts studio with Arts Access Victoria.

  • Danni Zuvela
  • Danni Zuvela is a curator and writer based in Melbourne and the Gold Coast. Her research is informed by interests in feminism, activism, ecology, language and performance. With Joel Stern, Danni has led Liquid Architecture as Artistic Director, and continues to develop curatorial projects for the organisation.

  • Eric Avery
  • Eric Avery is a Ngiyampaa, Yuin, Bandjalang and Gumbangirr artist. As part of his practice Eric plays the violin, dances and composes music. Working with his family’s custodial songs he seeks to revive and continue on an age old legacy – continuing the tradition of singing in his tribe – utilising his talents to combine and create an experience of his peoples culture.

  • Fjorn Butler
  • Fjorn Butler is an artist, researcher, and event organiser. As an artist, she works primarily in sound and performance under the name Papaphilia. As a researcher, she interrogates how biological discourses are used in neoliberal/colonial governance structures to shape the political. Fjorn's research informs her writing on sound-poetics and the challenges this framework poses to anglophone notions of property. She is also co-director of Future Tense and co-curator of Writing and Concepts.

  • Freya Schack-Arnott
  • Freya Schack-Arnott is an Australian/Danish cellist who enjoys a multi-faceted career as a soloist and ensemble performer of classical and contemporary repertoire, curator and improviser within experimental music, electronics, popular and cross-disciplinary art forms. Schack-Arnott regularly performs with Australia's leading new music ensembles, including ELISION Ensemble (as core member) and Ensemble Offspring. Her curatorial roles include co-curator/founder of the regular 'Opus Now' music series and previous curator of the NOW Now festival and Rosenberg Museum.

  • Gooooose
  • Gooooose (Han Han) is an electronic music producer, visual artist and software developer based in Shanghai, China. His current releases include They (D Force, 2017), Dong 1 (D Force, 2018), Pro Rata (ANTE-RASA, 2019). Gooooose's 2019 SVBKVLT–released RUSTED SILICON received positive reviews from media including boomkat, Resident Advisor, Dusted Magazine, and The Wire. Gooooose has performed live at CTM (Berlin, 2018), Nyege Nyege (Kampala, 2019), Soft Centre (Sydney, 2019), Unsound (Kraków, 2019) and Recombinant (San Francisco, 2019).

  • Harmony Holiday
  • Harmony Holiday is a writer, dancer, archivist, director, and the author of four collections of poetry, Negro League Baseball, Go Find Your Father/A Famous Blues, Hollywood Forever, and A Jazz Funeral for Uncle Tom. She lives in New York and Los Angeles.

  • James Rushford
  • James Rushford is an Australian composer-performer who holds a doctorate from the California Institute of the Arts, and was a 2018 fellow at Academy Schloss Solitude in Stuttgart. His work is drawn from a familiarity with specific concrète, improvised, avant-garde and collagist languages. Currently, his work deals with the aesthetic concept of musical shadow. James has been commissioned as a composer by ensembles including the BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra (Glasgow), and Melbourne Symphony Orchestra, and regularly performs in Australia and internationally.

  • Jessica Aszodi
  • Jessica Aszodi is an Australian-born, London-based vocalist who has premiered many new pieces, performed work that has lain dormant for centuries, and sung roles ranging from standard operatic repertoire to artistic collaborations. She has been a soloist with ensembles including ICE; the Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide Symphony Orchestras; and San Diego and Chicago Symphony Orchestras’ chamber series. Aszodi can be heard on numerous recordings and has sung in festivals around the world. She holds a Doctorate of Musical Arts from the Queensland Conservatorium, an MFA from the University of California, and is co-director of the Resonant Bodies Festival (Australia), and artistic associate of BIFEM.

  • KT Spit
  • Kt Spit (Katie Collins) is an artist and musician based in Narrm (Melbourne). Lyrically and visually her work explores subcultural narratives and challenges dominant representations of loss, grief, and true love. In 2015 Kt independently released her debut album, Combluotion, and in 2019 will release a visual album entitled Kill the King.

  • Immy Chuah and The Convoy
  • The Convoy conjure illustrious soundscapes from the abyss of chaos, revealing hidden worlds of the imagination as the performance takes form and infuses with subjective experience. Using instruments of sound, light and smell, The Convoy enchant space with themes of tension, evolution, entropy and regeneration. Sensorial immersion transports audiences through highly dynamic environments that shift and blend into one single, breathing moment. As entity, rather than singular, Immy Chuah is a guest within The Convoy on unceded land.

  • Sam Peterson
  • Sarah McCauley
  • Sarah McCauley is a Melbourne-based music producer, editor and writer.

  • Neil Morris
  • Neil Morris is a Yorta Yorta, Dja Dja Wurrung man. He is well known in Narrm/Birraranga for his musical project DRMNGNOW, a project built on subject matter tackling the colonial nature of the Australian construct and how that affects contemporary society upon this land. The work is unapologetic, clear, and deeply poetic. It hints toward Morris's extensive experience as a spoken word artist in Narrm since 2015. Morris's work is triumphant in the face of severe adversity often imbued in a quite fortified melancholy, a powerful marker of the survival of First Nations peoples in the now.

  • Natasha Tontey
  • Natasha Tontey is an artist and graphic designer based in Yogyakarta. She is interested in exploring the concept of fiction as a method of speculative thinking. Through her artistic practice she investigates the idea of how fear, horror, and terror could be manifested in order to control the public and how fictional accounts of the history and myth surrounding ‘manufactured fear’ might operate as a method of speculative fiction that determines expectations for the future.

  • Mat Spisbah
  • Mat Spisbah is a New Media curator with a unique portfolio of programming that seeks to integrate non-traditional artistic methods and emerging technologies. Having lived in Hong Kong for 14 years, he is connected to the region’s art and culture, and has created professional networks with artists, curators, galleries, promoters and industry professionals across Australasia. Portfolio highlights include the debut Australian performances of north Asian artists including: Howie Lee, Rui Ho, Meuko Meuko, Pan Daijing, Alex Zhang Hungtai, Tzusing, and Gabber Modus Operandi.

  • Mandy Nicholson
  • Mandy Nicholson is a Wurundjeri-willam (Wurundjeri-baluk patriline) artist and Traditional Custodian of Melbourne and surrounds. Mandy also has connections to the Dja Dja wurrung and Ngurai illam wurrung language groups of the Central/Eastern Kulin Nation. Mandy gained a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Aboriginal Archaeology in 2011, worked for the Victorian Aboriginal Corporation for Languages for six years and is now a PhD candidate studying how Aboriginal people connect to Country, Off Country.

  • Lucreccia Quintanilla
  • Lucreccia Quintanilla is an artist, writer, DJ and PhD candidate researcher at Monash University. Her writing and art have been published and exhibited both within Australia and internationally. Quintanilla’s practice is a collaborative one that manifests into outcomes within galleries and also as events and performances outside of that context. She regularly speaks at panels and symposiums on themes within her research, has received grants for her projects and residencies, and has taught at university level.

  • Amanda Stewart
  • Amanda Stewart is a poet, author, and vocal artist. She has created a diverse range of publications, performances, film and radio productions in Australia, Europe, Japan, and the USA, working in literature, new music, broadcasting, theatre, dance, and new media environments. Amanda collaborated with Chris Mann for many years in the Australian ensemble, Machine For Making Sense (with Jim Denley, Rik Rue, and Stevie Wishart), as well as in other contexts. Her poem ‘ta’ was written in honour of Chris Mann’s extraordinary vision and work.

  • Holly Childs
  • Holly Childs is an artist and writer. Her research involves filtering stories of computation through frames of ecology, earth, memory, poetry, and light. She is the author of two books: No Limit (Hologram, Melbourne) and Danklands (Arcadia Missa, London), and she collaborates with Gediminas Žygus on ‘Hydrangea’. She is currently writing her third book, What Causes Flowers Not to Bloom?.

  • Ivy Alvarez
  • Ivy Alvarez’s poetry collections include The Everyday English Dictionary, Disturbance, and Mortal. Her latest is Diaspora: Volume L (Paloma Press, 2019). A Fellow of MacDowell Colony (US), and Hawthornden (UK), her work is widely published and anthologised (twice in Best Australian Poems), with poems translated into Russian, Spanish, Japanese and Korean. Born in the Philippines and raised in Australia, she lived in Wales for almost a decade, before arriving in New Zealand in 2014.

  • Nick Ashwood
  • Nick Ashwood is a guitarist, composer, improviser and performer from Nipaluna/Tasmania now residing in Sydney. His focuses have been exploring deep listening, harmonic space and the possibilities of the steel-string acoustic guitar by means of preparations, just intonation, objects and bowing.

  • Johnny Chang
  • Berlin-based composer-performer Johnny Chang engages in extended explorations surrounding the relationships of sound/listening and the in-between areas of improvisation, composition and performance. Johnny is part of the Wandelweiser composers collective and currently collaborates with: Catherine Lamb (Viola Torros project), Mike Majkowski (illogical harmonies), Phill Niblock, Samuel Dunscombe, Derek Shirley and others.

  • Megan Alice Clune
  • Megan Alice Clune shifts between musician, composer and artist. Primarily, her work explores both the concept and aesthetics of ambient music through sound installation, collaboration and performance. Megan is the founding member of the Alaska Orchestra, and has presented work and undertaken residencies across Australia, Asia, Europe and North America, including the Bang on a Can Summer Music Festival (MA), Next Wave Festival, Underbelly Arts Festival, Performa 15 (NYC) and VividLIVE at the Sydney Opera House.

  • Andrew Fedorovitch
  • Andrew Fedorovitch is compos mentis.
 Andrew Fedorovitch embodies professionalism in every aspect of his life, including music.

  • Shota
  • Shota is an artist working in Australia. He makes sound-based works for varying contexts. He has had the opportunity to collaborate with a multitude of artists from varying disciplines. Shota is currently an honours student who is associated with the Plant ecophysiology and Ecosystem processes lab at the University of Sydney.

  • Sonya Holowell
  • Sonya Holowell is a Dharawal woman, vocalist, composer and writer working across new and experimental genres. The contexts for her work, and the forms they take, are diverse and deeply questioning. Her practice comprises interdisciplinary collaboration, improvisation, multi-form writing and conceptual composition. She is also a workshop facilitator; a curator of the Now Now Festival; lecturer in experimental vocal practice; and a co-founder/editor of online arts publication ADSR Zine.

  • Alexandra Spence
  • Alexandra Spence is an artist and musician living on Gadigal country in Sydney, Australia. She makes installations, compositions and performances based on (everyday) sound and listening. Through her practice she attempts to reimagine the intricate relationships between the listener, the object, and the surrounding environment as a kind of communion or conversation. She has a current, near-spiritual, obsession with the animation of material and object through sound. Alex has performed and presented work on radio, in concerts, festivals, symposiums and galleries worldwide, and has two releases: Waking, She Heard The Fluttering, with Room40, and Immaterial, with Longform Editions.

  • MP Hopkins
  • MP Hopkins is an artist based in Sydney, Australia, that is concerned with how to record voices that are not really there, and ways to make voices that are there not sound like voices. He makes audio recordings, performances, and texts.

Artist Title | 00:00 / 00:00 (Play)



The Scroll Begins Unfolding:
Lin Chi-Wei in conversation with
Alessandro Bosetti

I met the work before meeting the person.

A beautifully embroidered scroll of fabric tape lies at the centre of two circles of chairs at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum. A moderator at the museum informs visitors about the starting time for the participatory performance. When the moment arrives, a few dozen casual visitors sit on chairs and the tape made of fabric begins to pass from one hand to another. The scroll begins unfolding. The participants read aloud what is written on the tape, both in Chinese and Romanisation, mostly consisting of a-semantic phonemes. The effect is striking. A surprising, polyphonic echo/delay emerges, carefully crafted to give life to musical consonances and rhythms.

The tape is very long and the piece goes on for some minutes. Participants continue reading aloud while their faces light up in surprise. No one wants the scroll to end, although we see it getting thinner and thinner at the centre of the circle, until the last bit leaves the peoples’ grasp and goes through the last pair of hands. The vocal polyphony fades out after the last person finishes what is left to read. It’s over.

Tape Music is perhaps the best-known piece by Taiwanese artist Lin Chi-Wei, recognised as one of the most fascinating figures of the Chinese and Taiwanese experimental music and sound scenes. Emerging from the noise scene of the 1990s and linked to the seminal group Zero and Sound Liberation Organization (Z.S.L.O.), festivals like Industrial Arts Festival, and the Taiwan International Electronic Music Phenomena, Lin Chiwei has developed an extremely original artistic identity across sound, music and performance, while maintaining strong ties to Taiwanese folk culture.

In 2000, he began studying at Studio National des Arts Contemporains, Le Fresnoy. In 2012, he published his first book, Beyond Sound Art: The Avant Garde, Sound Machine and the Modernity of Hearing.

—Alessandro Bosetti

(play) (pause)
00:00 / 00:00

I once read a phrase of yours and it keeps coming back in mind when I think of your work and our conversations. The phrase goes: ‘I consider my work as a form of communication. One should, therefore, realise to whom one is talking, and where the conversation is going.’1 This could be considered a banal statement, nevertheless, coming from an artist of sound and visual art, one who has very little connection with mainstream entertainment culture, this statement sounds both refreshing and odd at the same time. How do you situate yourself? How do you choose the subjects that you would like to talk about? What are these subjects? Are they already there or are they your own creations?

  1. Interview by Alastair Noble in White Fungus magazine. 


I was more concerned with Dadaist and Situationist intentions when I said ‘to whom and where’. That means there is a series of strategies of social action ‘beyond expectations’ that can be a ‘revelation of tacit regulations’. I will give an example for each of them.

For ‘beyond expectation’, in the session entitled Social Measure for Tape Music, typically no instructions were provided in advance. The audience would gradually realise that there would be no performance without them doing something, only after they had the tape in their hands.

For the ‘revelation of tacit regulations’, there are diverse ways. In line with the inactivity of a Taiwanese audience in the theatre, I recorded my own words in the Visionary series in front of the audience. These included the words ‘I will march over your head when I leave this room’. Then I left it on repeat and modulated the sound from a cassette player. The difference between the rhetoric and the direct expression is therefore reduced. When one constantly repeats certain phrases, like in the music of Steve Reich, people get hypnotised. I would then be able to keep the promise. In the end, I would literally leave the room, walking over the heads of the audience, although it seemed quite difficult to achieve at the beginning. The audience are possessed by the overwhelming regulation of the theatre and become paralysed.

In another even more theatrical case I used a very clearly visible electric circuit in the auditorium seats in order to induce electric shocks. After the audience took their seats I began practicing a kind of Taoist gymnastics and played a recording from a cassette deck in front of the audience. It was a poem that I recited to honour the three well-known inventions of Thomas Edison: the light-bulb, phonograph and electric chair. The phases were mixed with the descriptions of legal procedures for Nazi deportation to concentration camps. At one given moment the recording revealed that the whole scene in the theatre was meant as a collective murder and started a countdown of ten seconds before the execution. I then gave them electric shocks, inevitably not agreeable (I tested them on myself before the performance). No one left their seats, as they believed that it was part of the performance.

This kind of performance was specifically directed toward certain circumstances, and one could not really move it elsewhere. It was necessary to come up with an appropriate strategy, one that responded to the crowd’s state of mind.


In this interview, what was equally in question was the ‘turn to the event’, or the fact that each and every one of your works was inseparable from a specific event. On the contrary, due to the distance with which I am used to applying when listening to and considering your musical works, it seems to me that you could split into two persons: one who always works with a social objective and another who is devoted to an aesthetics indifferent to the social modality of participation through listening.

Even your most well-known work, Tape Music, is a work — or it may be preferable to call it a series of works — that is a lot more complex and rooted more in composition than it may appear at the beginning. Beyond the immediate relational force there is an incredibly strong attention paid to the compositional detail! What is your relationship with composition and musique concrète in the construction of complex sound objects?


There are several questions here, but you have clearly seen the paradoxical dimensions that always exist in my works, especially in Tape Music. There is a side that I call ‘social measure’ and another that can be called the ‘artistic’. The two sides do not always go hand in hand!

I want to say that the original version of Tape Music, since its debut in 2004, was merely designed to demonstrate a concept of ‘here and now’: the state of the audiences’ temporal gathering (be it practitioners in their temple, students at their school, or workers in their factory). Typically, I do not give instructions to the audience before a performance. This means that no one knows what will happen before the show starts.

There was no given agreement but when the tape is transmitted into your hand you are obliged to react right away. In most cases one person starts to read the tape and others follow suit. But there are always people who improvise in unpredictable ways. At times there were also occasions when no one reacted, though this rarely happened.

The Social Measure version is typically never played twice in front of the same audience. This essentially means that there was never any rehearsal!

The other side, or what we can call the ‘artistic’ side, is therefore very limited. I came to this conclusion after several years of experimenting with crowds. To augment the artistic expression, it is necessary not only to rehearse, but also to play with experienced musicians.

It wasn’t possible for me until 2014, more than ten years after the debut of Social Measure, to start to compose for enthusiasts who were interested in exploring the possibility of expressions for my solo exhibition at the gallery IT Park. In 2015, via an invitation from Weiyu and Kaiwei for a gig at Cafe OTO, we would meet and work with the London-based chorus MUSARC, which is composed of serious musicians who were keen to explore the artistic dimensions of the tape. Soon after, in 2016, I wrote a special long version for them to bring to different music festivals. That has largely turned the Social Measure into a real performance.


How do you see the world of electroacoustic music and its immense archives?


‘Electroacoustic music’ seems to always have dual aspects to me, which are even more present today than before; the duality is the contrast between ‘traditional aesthetics’ and ‘open methodology’. Last year I experienced all of the works for an electroacoustic music contest, which lasted two evenings. I was surprised to find more than forty works selected, compositions coming from Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Considering how few resources exist in the electroacoustic scene in Asian countries it was an enormous number! But what really surprised me was how these composers shared the same aesthetic. Going from one piece to the other without many ‘interruptions’, I was under the impression that one could not easily distinguish one from another!

But if we consider electroacoustic music merely as an open methodology, not so much as a specific aesthetic, then the output can be really abundant! I think it is pretty much the case that when we talk about ‘electronic music’ today we cannot ignore the fact that most musical productions, regardless of musical genre, are digital. So in a broad sense, every recorded type of music has its ‘electronic’ aspect. It is the same for the term electroacoustic. When we appropriate a recording from any context and use it in a music composition, we create a ‘sound object’ and then we manipulate this object according to all possible means and aesthetics. Whether it is ambient, bruitist, EDM, sound installation, or even rap and pop music, all kinds of music receive the influence of the electroacoustic methodology, though probably not so much its aesthetics! For me, this vocabulary exploded long ago. So when I consider the immense archives that it results in, it can be an abundant resource as material for all kinds of sonic practices.


Are you in the process of writing an opera? What is your relationship with traditional Taiwanese music?


Well, it is true that we are working on a collective project, but it’s not really like an opera. It’s rather something else. I started working two years ago on this project Human Dynamic Coordination Models with the help of the film director Singing Chen and theatre director Snow Huang. It is a system devised in order for actors and singers to improvise according to a series of interactive codes. It ensures the counterpoint and synchronisation of the whole structure without a fixed timeline or definite sequence. These ‘coordination models’ work in an unconventional way. We give a series of ‘rules’ before each rehearsal and leave the actor-singers to improvise and interact without interrupting them during the process. We observe their interactions to see which rules work and which don’t, so we can rewrite the rules for the next rehearsal. In this way, we have experimented with about fifteen models with groups of performers over the past two years.

For half of the models the results were exciting, and the other half just didn’t work. But for all these models we tested a fundamental question. As a training tool for a workshop it functioned perfectly well, but if we insist on a totally random methodology it is not easy to adapt it to a live performance. However, we don’t expect for it to be a stage show at this moment and are working on a video version. Actually, it is a kind of video instruction manual or tutorial, which allows people to see the principles of how it works.

It is interesting that you notice the evident connection between traditional music and my works. I do think that much traditional music, especially sound and music in ritual contexts, functions under a certain set of rules. This actually represents a kind of ‘model’.

I am very much interested in traditional Taiwanese music, like Nan-Kwan (Nanguan) music for example; recently I am working with Nan-Kwan musician friends on experimental compositions. These pieces are classical in terms of the styles and scales, though with modern lyrics and metres. I get really excited when I imagine how they will be played at tea ceremonies!

In the 1990s, I had a chance to attend courses taught by major researchers in this area. Professor Chui-Kuan Lu opened my eyes and ears to fieldwork in ethnomusicology, especially related to Nan-Kwan and Taoist rituals. All these experiences allowed me to take a step back and embrace the cultural traditions instead of staying within the very limited range of imagination of the contemporary art circle.


The music in Erotic Journey to the West (Erotiches Reise nach Westen) is exquisite. What happened during your Erotic Journey to the West? Why is it the only work with a CD release in your career? Why is the title in German?


Erotic Journey was created during my stay in France, which was quite an emotional time in my life. I worked and composed in the dormitory of an ancient textile factory in Roubaix, under the low-hanging sky and the Flemish industrial landscape. I listened to nothing but some CDs that my friends had left me, such as Franz Schubert’s Winterreise and a compilation of Leonard Cohen’s greatest hits. All the rest seemed too harsh and noisy to me. I was not aware of my state until one day on my way home from some grocery shopping, along the canal, I accidentally saw some burning, floating dead leaves on the water. As I raised my head I saw the trees around literally in flames before me, just like in Van Gogh’s paintings.

The Erotic Journey was inspired by Schwitters’ The Cathedral of erotic Misery (Die Kathedrale des erotischen Elends). It is true that after the split of the Z.S.L.O. group around 1998, I had not released anything in CD album format but Erotic Journey. I am a disorganised artist. This is already very bad for production of work. But what really limits my productivity is that I cannot create without a target, or, to be more precise, I need to know who will listen and react to my music. In Roubaix, fortunately, I had dear friends around me who understood and supported me. It was because of them that I could start to create, but this was a rather rare case.

After returning to Asia in 2003, the active audiences from the 90s student movement had disappeared. There were very few fans of experimental music. I started to look for other targets. Since media art and sound art were fashionable in the art circle, I thought that maybe I could do something for the scene. In 2004, I was invited to play in a festival for technological art. I found myself on the program alongside Francisco Lopez and Carl Stone on the same stage. It turned out to be interesting to me to challenge the audience’s taste for ‘technological art’. Rather than making some laptop music, I transcribed an anti-war poem on a very long plastic ribbon for the audience to read. I invited a presenter who would direct the audience on how to play four little noise instruments with four little flags (each of them had these noise instruments). We announced that it was a concert of analogue and digital 3-bit music. The result was a minor riot. The majority of the audience was amused, while those more interested in ‘new media’ were quite annoyed. That was also the origin of the Tape Music series …


During the years of Z.S.L.O., some pieces were very neatly conceived, yet at the same time quite violent. You produced an impressive body of extraordinary noise works. Could you tell me more about the words that make up this name? Why Zero? Why Sound? (As, for example, an opposition to ‘music’?) Why Liberation? And why Organization, which is so different from group, collective, orchestra, and so on?


It was the ‘frontman’ of our group, Steve Chan, who conceived of the name in the literary club at Fujen Catholic University before our first rehearsal in 1992, which was a turbulent time of social movements in Taiwan. I think his inspiration came from some kind of ‘terrorist’ group with whom he sympathised at that time. As for Zero, it might have something to do with his own nihilist philosophy; Steve was a Hong Kong student who studied philosophy. It is also important to know that the name was conceived in Chinese, 零與聲音解放組織, where the Sound was composed of sheng (聲) and yin (音). The two words together mean sound. But there is a variation of the meaning. The character for sheng is an ear that listens to the sound of a lithophone, signifying the physical sound which, according to Confucians, is known to all animals and inferior men. The word yin originated from ‘speaking’ or ‘pronunciation’, signifying the original sound of the spirit that was moulded and shaped as a structure, which was in turn reserved for the superiors. Anyway, even in Chinese, the name Z.S.L.O. is rather perverse and strange.

At the beginning of the 1990s we preserved ‘Zero and Sound’ but constantly changed the second half of the name from ‘Liberation Organization’ according to the needs of each specific scene, such as ‘Zero and Sound Monster Liberation’. Then the name got more or less fixed around 1995, when the means of the work started to become more steady. We brought about a narrower methodology, resembling that of musique concrète, which we had a hard time working with at first. That means we observed a gradual ossification, one that we were not really aware of at that time. Singing Liu, another group member, vividly described that state in his memoir after a decade, ‘Chaos opened his seven orifices’ (according to the words of Chuang Tzu) and that was the end of our group.


In your work, your house, and your personality, I find a lack of differentiation between what is contemporary and what is old or very ancient. I find that very inspiring. Although you surely would not ignore historical process, it seems to me that your imaginary is full of images and thoughts that come from a world very much distant in time and yet this does not pose any problem. The preoccupations of the musical scene often refer to quite narrow historical scales: the 60s, the 50s, and so on. Even the rise of Romanticism in music was only 200 years ago. What happens if we start to embrace deeper, longer distances in time and civilisation when we think about music?


In ritual music we can find a path toward the past. You can hear the echo of extremely ancient sounds in the aboriginal ceremonies and the shamanic rituals of Tangki. In Taoist music you can hear a voice that is more than a thousand years old. This is present even in the ceremonies paying homage to Confucius, which date back at least 300 years. In Taiwan we actually live in a living heritage.

Even in the music of the present time we can also find an ancient spirit revived by today’s musicians. This essentially means an ability to evoke. Ritual music is not just a ceremony of evocation but it evokes a body, a system of liaisons both between humans, and between humans and nature. These evocations have a long-lasting efficacy after the practice.

At the same time, I do not want to deny that today’s musicians are also led to evoke the spirit of consumerism! And the grand traditions that I just mentioned here are on the verge of collapse. Even the small traditions we have can’t last forever. But ritual music will nonetheless find the proper body that it is looking to find.


Also, on a related theme, the tension between the possibility and the impossibility of a transposition of a set of memories is something that interests me in particular. Here, I consider memory as an alive and useful medium for composition, recording and writing, and not a simple receptacle for nostalgia.

Above all I think of the use of memory as a medium of work that runs alternative to temporal linearity-proper in sound and performance, as in the works of Mette Edvardsen, for example. Could you give a few suggestions on ways to use memory as a living tool for artistic and sonic creation?


Wow … these are sensible questions that no one has ever posed to me in interviews. As you mentioned, it is above all the dialectic between the possibility and the impossibility of expression that reigns in the domain of the representation of memory. I totally agree. There is a situation that we enact or paint in order to enter a ‘performative’ state where the memory takes its principal role. But for me, it is rather ‘the evocation’ rather than ‘the memorisation’ […] that can be made with the small signs of memory: objects, images, certain sounds. In order to work on some pieces I dive into emotions that certain objects evoke in me. For example, with the help of old photos left by female relatives in my family I have tried to approach the sadness they endured for many years. In the creation of my mix-media collage Ceremony of a Shell (Cérémonie d’une Coquille), some small papers with words left in my grandmother’s sacred Buddhist book, in which she expresses the despair of her life, was a key for me to go into her unknown story. This emotion managed to last for hours when I worked, and I thus could form some kind of mandala from the rediscovered materials and the objects/photos of her time.

Or we can also take a look at the piece ‘A Leaving Song’ in the Erotic Journey to the West. This was also made with the emotion evoked by certain extremely specific sounds, although I am not sure whether this would allow me to transfer my sentiments through this recording.


How do you negotiate your life between Taipei and Shanghai? What is the situation of artists of mainland China in 2018, and what differentiates them from, for example, that of the year 2000? After the seething time of the 1990s and 2000s, do you think a new wave and a new scene of ‘experimental music’ is conceivable on both sides of the sea? Or is there something different fused with the worlds of visual arts and activism that might take shape?


Well, I don’t know if I am capable of answering this question since, I am pretty distant from the actual scene. Historically speaking, from the side of Taiwan between 1966 and 1968 there was a big stream of musical nativists, a tendency of connecting fieldwork (on traditional music) to contemporary composition, which provided inspirations and resources that composers needed in the 1970s and 1980s. The ‘bruitism period’ came after the Tiananmen Massacre and the Wild Lily movement in Taiwan, between 1992 and 1998. After the year 2000, there came a new generation of ‘laptop music’. But we must know that all these currents were not really connected. This means that the new generation are above all things inspired by the Western world and the fashions of their time rather than by local and historical resources. In China, the infrastructure for experimental music (concert houses, academia, music industry, media) didn’t develop well in the last twenty years. Especially after the 2008 Olympics, independent spaces and festivals became a lot more controlled than before. Musicians are therefore put in a state of constant difficulty. I have great respect for my underground colleagues who have the courage to struggle and to create in an unfavourable conjuncture and continuous uncertainty.

I believe that academic work on art will play a role even more important than before, because the scene of ‘contemporary art’ is the one system that arrives to function publicly, in terms of innovation. We can’t prevent the experimental musical scene from continuing to integrate with the world of contemporary art. On this issue of the two sides of the sea, including Hong Kong, they are more or less in a similar situation.


Among all the artists I have encountered, you are probably the only artist in Asia that takes France and the French language as his connection with the world of Western art, which, on the contrary, seems to be quite colonised by the English language. I am Italian and you are Taiwanese, and we both speak in French and English, so we have the chance to choose one of these languages for communication. For you, the choice always seems, somewhat instinctively, more likely to be French. Why is that?


We use English as a communication tool all the time and when there’s a chance to use French I will not miss it.


Taiwan seems to me to be a serene place — placid yet at times impregnated with a kind melancholy. It also feels suspended at the verge of a geopolitical conflict, a potentially dangerous one. However, it provides a link to the enormous cultural and linguistic world of China, has a well preserved subtropical environment, and a relative freedom of expression for artists who work in the Chinese language who often find themselves more and more brutally censored in mainland China. On the one hand, the social and gender norms seem to be strict, but at the same time there is a certain kind of lightness. What do you make of these naive feelings from an outsider? Would it be too distant to think of a future Taiwan as an artistic laboratory?


As for the cultural resources that I need for my own artistic work, Taiwan is incredibly generous. This island is the only place where the Chinese language still preserves all the precious traditional rituals of Buddhism, Taoism, and Shamanism, which I have been delving into since my adolescence. Linguistically especially, Taiwanese is the language that best preserves Chinese phonetics from the Middle Ages, so that we can sing the poems of Tang Dynasty in Taiwanese without much modification in rhymes, which are notably lost in Mandarin. It could be also essential for the revival of esoteric Buddhist (mikkyō) traditions in the practices of poetry. I find the Taiwanese language to be one of the indispensable keys.

As for an artistic laboratory in the short term … Yes! This is because, since 1997, Taiwan has developed a new system of sponsorship for art that is quite advanced among Asian countries. It is evident that the art scene in several domains has noticeably expanded in the last twenty years. But, in the long term, we will also see the difficulty of cultural accumulation, for the power holders always have a tendency to efface the culture established by their predecessors in order to gratify their political needs. And in this way, the dialectics of cultural identity are reduced to actual political options.


Tape Music created some ephemeral communities. People were united by the only similar trait of having a phonatory organ and a linguistic competence of one kind or another. I am personally very interested in ‘anonymous communities’ (and I like to use radio to create them). This is because communitarianism in the contemporary world seems more and more strict and dangerous, obliging us to put a stamp on our head to say who we are, what category of human we belong to, what social group represents us, and so on. I think that encounters should always be surprising if we want to hope for a new universalism … What do you think of these communities?


Totally, as you said we are in a sensitive period, today more than ever. The community is constantly renewed and redefined by new technological tendencies and the political condition. In a time when artistic creation is largely institutionalised, we are obliged to continue to question how ‘interactive art’, ‘participatory art’ and ‘social art’ could even be valid today.

I also often doubt whether Tape Music succeeded in creating a temporary autonomous assembly in diverse contexts. I should admit that it is not always evident. As a tool created in the context of the ‘third world’ it often seems, in front of an experienced audience — especially in some places in Europe, that Tape Music functions too well. This is because the audience that frequents the experimental scene already has a pre-existing, collective convention to form the music.

On the contrary, for the naive participants who do not know anything about ‘experimental music’ or ‘social art’, Tape Music will create a tension, like an ambiguous ambience, in which no one knows exactly what role they have, and what is expressed through their voices. In this case, the crowd will seek to identify themselves, maybe in the sense of forming a new, ephemeral community.

There is also a good combination of the two. One time in a community in Stockholm, for example, we created a perfect harmony that I had never heard before via Tape Music. It appeared that everyone listened to each other before really engaging in it. In the talk after the gig, the participants also taught me the idea of lagom (‘as it should’), which is an essential word of Swedish democracy. They almost forgot my existence in the talk and argued for one hour about lagom and its political problems. That was a perfect experience to me! I hope one day Tape Music will become an educational model, so that students can succeed in forming a group that integrates all sorts of elements without much technology. Without the guidance of an orchestra or theatre director, yet still succeeding in synchronising a complex performance composed and directed by themselves, one outside of the norms of traditional music.


Once you gave me a book you wrote, entitled Beyond Sound Art: The Avant-Garde, Sound Machines, and the Modernity of Hearing. The book is in Mandarin. You gave it to me anyway, although you knew that I would not understand it. I appreciated the gesture and I keep the book as a treasure, which probably contains a different history from what I know and experience. Could you summarise what is newly found in that book? Is it going to be translated?


Beyond Sound Art was made only for creating a Chinese-language database for sound art. When I returned to Taipei around 2003, after four years of absence, ‘sound art’ had become fashionable. Everyone in art circles was talking about it without an actual basic knowledge of the history of sound art. (It is true that the definition of ‘sound art’ remains a debatable subject, but this was not even the question at that time.) I noticed that it was necessary to provide the public with a lot of information in order to deepen their knowledge of sound in art. That, too, was a kind of personal devotion, in order to take responsibility for all that we did in the 1990s. So it took me ten years to finish this book, which is 700,000 characters long. In principle the book is a compilation of essays regarding the avant-garde, technology of sound, and the modernity of listening. In order to avoid falling into the company of the history of modern music/contemporary art/technology/sociology […] I tried to explain the trajectory and functioning of a social, technological and cultural complex, since the ‘subject’ produces all kinds of ‘noises’. Since the materials I propose here are very well-known in Western countries, I do not think that it should be translated

On the contrary, I have another translation project for literature concerning Chinese sound, which puts the accent in its relation to sound, philosophy, spiritualism, and erotism. I think this, rather, may be of interest to European readers.


Lin Chi-Wei is a legend of Taiwanese sonic art, whose practice incorporates folklore culture, noise, ritual, and audience participation.

Alessandro Bosetti is an Italian composer, performer and sound artist, currently based in Marseille. His work delves into the musicality of spoken language, utilising misunderstandings, translations and interviews as compositional tools. His works for voice and electronics blur the line between electro-acoustic composition, aural writing and performance.


Original interview in French for Revue et Corrigée by Alessandro Bosetti (2018), translated into English by Chia-Yu Liang and Wei Wang for Taipei Performance Art Center, English proofreading by Benny Schaffer & Alessandro Bosetti.


    Disclaimer is a journal for new thinking and writing on listening and sound. Published by Liquid Architecture • Disclaimer is a journal for new thinking and writing on listening and sound. Published by Liquid Architecture